LB
LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 diluted EPS was $0.75, down from $0.81 in Q1 2025 and up from $0.52 in Q2 2024; net income was $4.4M, with ROAA 1.11%, ROAE 12.25%, and efficiency ratio 62.8% .
- Strong loan growth (+$42.9M; +16.0% annualized) and net interest margin expansion (+7 bps to 3.83%) drove revenue; non-interest income rose sequentially, while deposits fell $61.9M largely on a quarter-end brokered deposit decline offset by increased borrowings .
- Credit quality was stable overall, but non-performing loans increased to $17.0M (1.52% of loans); management recorded a $1.0M provision and noted one ~$2.6M office CRE loan placed on nonaccrual was brought current just after quarter end .
- Board declared a $0.21 per-share dividend (96th consecutive quarterly cash dividend), reinforcing capital return amid operating momentum; near-term stock catalysts include sustained margin expansion vs. deposit gathering progress and NPL trajectory .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Loan demand remained strong across residential mortgage (+$21.5M), commercial (+$13.4M), and CRE (+$10.9M); total gross loans exceeded $1.1B .
- Net interest margin expanded 7 bps Q/Q to 3.83% and 62 bps Y/Y; net interest income rose 4.3% Q/Q and 24.7% Y/Y on higher loan balances and lower deposit costs .
- Non-interest income increased $268K Q/Q, driven by higher gains on mortgage sales (+$178K) and higher fees (+$88K); expenses remained well controlled with lower professional fees .
- Management tone: “continued strong net earnings…growth in loans and net interest income…credit quality remained solid overall” — Abby Wendel, CEO .
What Went Wrong
- Period-end deposits declined $61.9M (driven by money market/checking and non-interest-bearing demand) due to brokered deposit reduction; borrowings increased $105.9M to fund assets .
- Non-performing loans rose to $17.0M (1.52% of loans) from $13.3M (1.24%) in Q1; provision for credit losses of $1.0M recorded to reflect loan growth and reserves on individually evaluated loans .
- Data processing expense increased $233K Q/Q due to added services and account growth; captive insurance subsidiary losses contributed to higher “other” non-interest expense .
Financial Results
Income Statement Summary vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Values with asterisks were retrieved from S&P Global.
S&P Global disclaimer: Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Note: Wall Street consensus estimates (EPS, revenue) were unavailable via S&P Global for LARK this quarter; therefore no beat/miss vs consensus is provided.
Margin and Cost Metrics
Balance Sheet and Credit KPIs
Loan Category Breakdown (End-of-Period Balances)
Guidance Changes
No formal quantitative guidance ranges were provided; management reiterated focus on deposit gathering initiatives and maintaining solid credit quality .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Continued strong net earnings…driven by growth in loans and net interest income…Non-interest income increased…expenses were well controlled…Credit quality remained solid…Provision for credit losses of $1.0M…to reflect the growth in loans and higher reserves against individually evaluated loans on non-accrual.” — Abby Wendel, CEO .
- “Net interest margin increased to 3.83%…interest income on loans increased $791,000…average loan balances increased $33.3M…average rate on interest-bearing deposits decreased 3 bps to 2.14%…other borrowed funds declined 11 bps to 4.98%.” — Mark Herpich, CFO .
- “We have big initiatives to gather more deposits primarily through the branch network…we fully plan to engage our teams in that work.” — Abby Wendel .
- “Two commercial real estate credits were placed on nonaccrual…one ~$2.6M office building was brought current just after quarter end.” — Raymond McLanahan, CCO .
Q&A Highlights
- Reserve adequacy and NPL trajectory: Management affirmed they are adequately provisioned; $1.0M provision largely reflects loan growth; the $2.6M nonaccrual was brought current shortly after quarter end, supporting an improving trend into Q3 .
- Deposits and funding strategy: Period-end deposits dipped; management highlighted branch-based deposit initiatives and noted ~$150M combined capacity at FHLB/FRB; participation in ICS Promontory brokered funding; a one-day bid miss caused a ~$40M quarter-end swing to FHLB borrowings .
- Strategic focus: Sustain high-quality loan demand while strengthening deposit base and efficiency improvements across operations .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global revenue actuals (defined as net interest income after provision plus non-interest income) were: Q2 2024 $14.694M*, Q1 2025 $16.477M*, Q2 2025 $16.309M*. Consensus means and EPS estimates were unavailable for LARK this quarter via S&P Global.
Values with asterisks were retrieved from S&P Global.
S&P Global disclaimer: Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Margin expansion remains intact (+7 bps Q/Q to 3.83%) amid disciplined deposit pricing and improving loan yields, supporting core earnings power .
- Robust loan growth (+$42.9M Q/Q) across residential, commercial, and CRE segments should sustain net interest income momentum; watch loan-to-deposit ratio now at 86.6% .
- Credit metrics warrant monitoring: NPLs rose to 1.52% of loans, but a key ~$2.6M exposure was brought current post-quarter; ACL coverage increased to 1.23% .
- Funding mix is a tactical lever: quarter-end brokered deposit decline drove higher borrowings; management indicates ample FHLB/FRB capacity and branch-led deposit initiatives for H2 2025 — a near-term narrative driver .
- Operating efficiency improved (62.8% vs 64.1% Q/Q; 67.9% Y/Y), aided by lower professional fees; continued scalability of fee income and mortgage sale gains can further support non-interest revenue .
- Capital position strengthened (equity/asset ratio 9.13%; book value $25.66), underpinning dividend continuity ($0.21/share) and flexibility for growth .
- With consensus estimates unavailable this quarter, the stock’s near-term setup hinges on visible margin trajectory and deposit gathering execution vs. resolution of NPLs; any updates on brokered funding stability and investment cash flows paying down borrowings could be incremental positives .